You womens need to chill with all these tattoos

ms_wonderland wrote: That's the point being made. If you see it as lipstick on a pig then you'll never see it as anything else anyway so your opinion is inconsequential.

I agree. That is why I don't see the point in differentiating. If you want to be discrete, be discrete. If you want to be loud, be loud. But whatever you do, do it for yourself.

Being discrete has its perks so I won't deny that. I can understand why someone would want to filter certain things about themselves.  Just know that the opinions or judgements that you are trying to avoid (if that is the reason behind your discretion) are still there. Those people aren't going to necessarily look past it if or when they find out.

Well when I first started getting tattoos, I was still working in Corporate America, so running around with a massive chest piece or neck tats is pretty career damaging for most office settings.

Even though I now work for myself, I still don't feel the urge to get massive pieces done. I don't judge those who do - it's their body, rock out. But IMO it's not attractive to see a woman in a gorgeous evening gown with massive chest pieces and neck tattoos. It's just not pretty to me. Unless you only spend time in an ink appreciative community, or you've already "arrived" to the point where you can be tatted head to toe & no one is going to deny you service or be judgmental, people should really think not only about the ink they intend to get, but where they want to get it done.

this thread is shocking to me... cuz I actually get judged for not having any tattoos or piercings.

<----------  Loves guys with tats

BeatriceBean wrote: The decent sisters realize that they can do better.