I'll be blunt though, if anything in this thread is inconsistent, it's the morale.
thread began with people raising their eyebrows at me posting the link.
Members provided reason as to why that isn't right. I agreed with them
and by page two, I removed the link, all identifying information of her
Despite this finger wagging, after the removal of the
link, there were repeated asks for the link/name and posts expressing
desire to see/know her.
Her Twitter, which I didn't provide was
then dropped. Suddenly, some who were agreeing with the critiquing of me
were in the same turn thanking
those who posted any identifying information of her.
and other links of her are now openly shared despite the general tone
being against this. Members are now switching from wagging their
e-fingers at me to openly critiquing or complimenting her. Even the clearly instigative posts are getting thanks-a-plenty.
What was once the spoken bane of this thread has now become its unspoken catalyst.
I think I now know why I dropped that link and why I've spilled tea and dox on many others in the past. In this particular case, I didn't feel or think of a genuine motive in doing so, I just felt it accompanied the situation and was far more comfortable since you're all strangers.
But I think the real reason why I dropped that link is because there is a clear demand. This is the culture of BHM at its purest and most blatant hence the outspoken false shock of many here.
It's more comfortable to look at when it's more subdued and obscured, isn't it? I won't shame any of you for that, that's cognitive dissonance at work; completely natural. Anyway, for those of you who told me it was wrong with genuine intent, I have read and heeded your words. For those who spoke against my action but in the same turn supported it...
For those who just don't get that I'm not outing her even though we're not close and I see her in good graces, I have faith in your brain.
I'm bored. This is my last post in this thread.