Woman Suing NJ for Rejecting Her License Plate

Post Reply

Page <1 3 456 7 >

Author

Message

Rating:

Topic Search

Topic Options

PurplePhase View Drop Down

Platinum Member

Joined: Jun 08 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 232632

Posted: Apr 19 2014 at 5:27pm

*waves to Rohan*

Sponsored Links

rohan

VIP Member

Joined: Mar 23 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 8454

Posted: Apr 19 2014 at 5:31pm

PurplePhase wrote:

*waves to Rohan*

Purpleeee! Heart

Hola, how you been? What made you change your name?

PurplePhase View Drop Down

Platinum Member

Joined: Jun 08 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 232632

Posted: Apr 19 2014 at 5:40pm

too many PMs about the other one. lol
it took a year or 2 to get it changed, but one day out of the blue it came thru.

Good to see you again.

kfoxx1998

Elite Member

Joined: Jul 06 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 116788

Posted: Apr 19 2014 at 5:42pm

So are we saying that plate is inflammatory and we wouldn't want it because it might make good Christians go into a blind violent rage? I mean I totally agree but I didn't expect a majority to acknowledge that the immediate response from Christians to the mere existence of atheists is to become violent and start stoning and burning niccahs. I thought the general consensus was that only Muslims were like that

afrokock

Elite Member

Joined: May 19 2008
Location: South London
Status: Offline
Points: 1266523

Posted: Apr 19 2014 at 5:48pm

kfoxx1998 wrote:

So are we saying that plate is inflammatory and we wouldn't want it because it might make good Christians go into a blind violent rage? I mean I totally agree but I didn't expect a majority to acknowledge that the immediate response from Christians to the mere existence of atheists is to become violent and start stoning and burning niccahs. I thought the general consensus was that only Muslims were like that

now you know!!

rohan

VIP Member

Joined: Mar 23 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 8454

Posted: Apr 19 2014 at 5:49pm

PurplePhase wrote:

too many PMs about the other one. lol
it took a year or 2 to get it changed, but one day out of the blue it came thru.

Good to see you again.

Ha, you were too popular on here, makes sense! : -) And really awesome to see you as well!

Edited by rohan - Apr 19 2014 at 5:50pm

afrokock

Elite Member

Joined: May 19 2008
Location: South London
Status: Offline
Points: 1266523

Posted: Apr 19 2014 at 5:50pm

rohan wrote:

afrokock wrote:

im good bro!!

life is good!

Good to hear man, good to hear!

hope you and the family been keeping well.

kfoxx1998

Elite Member

Joined: Jul 06 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 116788

Posted: Apr 19 2014 at 5:50pm

rohan wrote:

JasmineE02 wrote:

Maybe people don't realize that you have to sue to compel the government to change its policy. She didn't just right out sue them either. She tried to contact them first assuming it was a mistake. They repeatedly brushed her off. The state can't give preferential treatment to any particular religion (or lack thereof even). If they made it to where no one was allowed to do it, this would even be an issue. For the people complaining that she's doing too much...they went out of their way to ban the word knowing it's unconstitutional. Things don't get changed...even the small, seemingly irrelevant stuff..without making a fuss. It's the principle of the matter and the message it sends.

By the nature of our very existence, we're not "objectionable"...I'm objectionable for a whole host of other reasons, thank you very much. Evil Smile

I think what's interesting here is that some of the responses in this thread reflect the majority mindset where unequal treatment for a minority class is usually met with "I don't see what the big deal is". I mean these are black folks that understand the problem of unequal treatment for minorities, no matter how minor, and the effects of having that treatment institutionalized by the government in any way. They get it. But when given a chance to be in a majority position over another minority group, in this case, atheists, suddenly none of it makes sense all over again.

Basically.

The responses would be different if the state rejected "blackpwr" but accepted "whitepwr". We might then see what the big deal is.

carolina cutie View Drop Down

Platinum Member

Joined: Jun 28 2006
Location: StrwberryFields
Status: Offline
Points: 337359

Posted: Apr 19 2014 at 5:51pm

Don't know about y'all but I'm about to try this in NC except I need to sue for discrimination. I need some emotional distress payments to cover school costs...oh and protect freedom of speech and all that jazz. Stern Smile