| Author |
|
EPITOME 
Platinum Member
Joined: Feb 08 2007
Location: Escarpin
Status: Offline
Points: 392847
|
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote  Reply
 Posted: Jan 03 2013 at 10:20pm |
 iGotSunshine wrote:
i didnt know people really believed he raped her |
what got the case thrown out is her sexual history if you read her interviews and the police reports.....idk that negro seems sketchy as hell
|
 |
|
Sponsored Links
|
|
|
ms_wonderland
Elite Member
Joined: Apr 05 2009
Location: TTT
Status: Offline
Points: 180349
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 03 2013 at 10:21pm |
Alias_Avi wrote:
Did he really rape that girl?
I don't remember that conclusion being the outcome. I thought they had consensual sex?
goodm3 wrote:
when you're husband rapes someone...and you stay.
don't sit, laid down for the rest of your life. |
|
didn't they find other men's dna inside of her when they did the rape kit? while rape is obviously much worse...i find the fact that he had unprotected anal sex with a total stranger super, super troubling.
|
|
Limalady
Elite Member
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 68154
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 03 2013 at 10:26pm |
|
The rape shield statute prohibits the use of sexual history in rape cases for the purposes of questioning a victim's credibility. They settled the case. He apologized and ACKNOWLEDGED that while he didn't believe it was rape, she did, and he should have been more considerate.
|
|
BBpants
VIP Member
Joined: Aug 24 2011
Location: No1curr
Status: Offline
Points: 103340
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 03 2013 at 10:28pm |
BeatriceBean wrote:
I agree, but I don't care. |
|
|
Gkisses
Elite Member
Joined: Jul 12 2008
Location: CrackaIsland
Status: Offline
Points: 244895
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 03 2013 at 10:32pm |
I believed that Kobe anally rapped her that case was handled so poorly with her name coming out, the leaking of her sexual history his stardom and the talks of her undies having the juice of multiple men.... twas a wrap.
|
|
Alias_Avi
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 10 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 169045
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 03 2013 at 10:37pm |
|
Damn. SMH
|
|
miana79
Elite Member
Joined: Aug 12 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 41529
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 03 2013 at 10:54pm |
Gkisses wrote:
I believed that Kobe anally rapped her that case was handled so poorly with her name coming out, the leaking of her sexual history his stardom and the talks of her undies having the juice of multiple men.... twas a wrap.
|
ewwww so she didnt bath or change panties 
|
|
EPITOME
Platinum Member
Joined: Feb 08 2007
Location: Escarpin
Status: Offline
Points: 392847
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 03 2013 at 11:02pm |
Limalady wrote:
The rape shield statute prohibits the use of sexual history in rape cases for the purposes of questioning a victim's credibility. They settled the case. He apologized and ACKNOWLEDGED that while he didn't believe it was rape, she did, and he should have been more considerate. |
did they settle? i thought they were allowed to bring in her sexual history bc she had other semen in her
|
|
Gkisses
Elite Member
Joined: Jul 12 2008
Location: CrackaIsland
Status: Offline
Points: 244895
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 03 2013 at 11:09pm |
miana79 wrote:
Gkisses wrote:
I believed that Kobe anally rapped her that case was handled so poorly with her name coming out, the leaking of her sexual history his stardom and the talks of her undies having the juice of multiple men.... twas a wrap.
|
ewwww so she didnt bath or change panties |
I cant remember exactly how it was explained but it was said she had sex earlier with a current or former BF another sample was not able to be identified and then there was kobe's as well. I cant be for sure but thats how i remember it going down...........The criminal case was dropped and kobe settled the civil matter.
|
|
Limalady
Elite Member
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 68154
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 03 2013 at 11:15pm |
EPITOME wrote:
Limalady wrote:
The rape shield statute prohibits the use of sexual history in rape cases for the purposes of questioning a victim's credibility. They settled the case. He apologized and ACKNOWLEDGED that while he didn't believe it was rape, she did, and he should have been more considerate. |
did they settle? i thought they were allowed to bring in her sexual history bc she had other semen in her |
Yup. They settled. They could offer the semen to suggest something other than her promiscuity negated the probability of rape. For instance, they could have suggested that she was raped by someone other than Kobe. From Wiki: On September 1, 2004 Eagle County District Judge Terry Ruckriegle dismissed the charges against Bryant, after prosecutors spent more than $200,000 preparing for trial, because his accuser informed them that she was unwilling to testify.[15] (Most likely due to the settlement) SettlementBefore the case was scheduled to go to trial, his accuser filed a civil lawsuit against Bryant over the incident. The two sides ultimately settled that lawsuit, with specific terms of the settlement being undisclosed to the public.[16] Bryant did, however, issue the following statement through his attorney (Most likely a term of the settlement), as part of an agreement with the accuser to dismiss the sexual assault charge: First, I want to apologize directly to the young woman involved in this incident. I want to apologize to her for my behavior that night and for the consequences she has suffered in the past year. Although this year has been incredibly difficult for me personally, I can only imagine the pain she has had to endure. I also want to apologize to her parents and family members, and to my family and friends and supporters, and to the citizens of Eagle, Colo. I also want to make it clear that I do not question the motives of this young woman. No money has been paid to this woman. She has agreed that this statement will not be used against me in the civil case. Although I truly believe this encounter between us was consensual, I recognize now that she did not and does not view this incident the same way I did. After months of reviewing discovery, listening to her attorney, and even her testimony in person, I now understand how she feels that she did not consent to this encounter. I issue this statement today fully aware that while one part of this case ends today, another remains. I understand that the civil case against me will go forward. That part of this case will be decided by and between the parties directly involved in the incident and will no longer be a financial or emotional drain on the citizens of the state of Colorado. [17]
|
|
|
Tweet
Topic Options
