Unpopular opinions 2012

hmm, the definition of a virgin is one having never been penetrated, yes? if any of your holes have been penetrated, you are not a virgin. And honestly, i dont believe true virgins have done anything sexual. I did nothing sexual until the first time I actually had sex. I hadnt even kissed a boy. Virginity is a form of physical purity, being sexual with another person isnt "keeping pure" jmtc...

Junior Jr wrote: ThoughtCouture wrote: what agenda? what econ? what 4 universities? at the very center of macro economics is the assumption that the market (left unregulated) will go to a state of equilibrium. and the effect of banking (lending/debt...creating debt out of thin air...not based on any sort of reserve) is considered negligible. yeah...watch the videos and then holla back... the agenda; that gov't knows how to control and invest. see the causes for all the past recessions and solyndra auburn, uchi, george mason and most of the ivies i think i see the point you're trying to make with equilibrium. it's of course affected by supply and demand. most argue that a company will slow down production to bring supplies down and shift the demand curve to the left, but corporations only have that power because they we helped to get to that "too big to fail" size in a true free mkt, other businesses can swoop in and take their business and bring prices back to equilibrium. but of course, small businesses have a hard time due to regulation. and banking is another topic....do you really wanna talk about that? jr.

lmmaaoooooooo @ swoop. small businesses would have a hard time swooping in regardless of govt reg.

anyway macro equilibrium as a function of only supply and demand is mathematically impossible unless outrageous "human assumptions" sre made.

and now that I know you don't have any mathematical basis for any of "your" arguments (which is ludicrous imo seeing as how modeling modeling market behavior would require mathematics...modeling any complex system for that matter)i can at least understand your misguided point of view.

Edited by rickysrose - Nov 21 2012 at 4:22pm

ThoughtCouture wrote: lmmaaoooooooo @ swoop. small businesses would have a hard time swooping in regardless of govt reg. anyway macro equilibrium as a function of only supply and demand is mathematically impossible unless outrageous "human assumptions" sre made. and now that I know you don't have any mathematical basis for any of "your" arguments (which is ludicrous imo seeing as how modeling modeling market behavior would require mathematics...modeling any complex system for that matter)i can at least understand your misguided point of view.

rickysrose wrote: I can't believe junior is still on this considering his very model of the free market working wonderfully didn't end well the whole notion of anti-trust laws stopping competition is ludicrous ... look at Rockefeller for example, one of the people that profited most from the Industrial Revolution and his company Standard Oil Company ... before the govt stepped in they corned 90% of the oil market through coercion, price fixing, corporate shape shifting, etc and after anti trust legislation we now have BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips and that's just splinters of Standard Oil much less giving room for other oil companies to thrive