| Author |
|
tatee
Elite Member
Joined: Jun 09 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 224178
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: sweet brown at it again Posted: Mar 13 2013 at 5:36am |
EPITOME wrote:
The suit, which was originally filed in June 2012, claims that not
only did the defendants sell the music for a profit, but that they also
claimed that Brown gave her consent. In the midst of the lawsuit,
apparently some drama took place between Brown and her attorneys,
because they have removed themselves from the case. Brown is now
representing herself, along with co-complainant Sparkell Adams.
According to Business Insider, the claim against Apple, at least, may
not hold up in court because The Digital Millennium Copyright Act
provides protection for companies if they promptly take action to remove
material whose copyright is disputed. Once Apple got wind of the
lawsuit, the song was removed. |
|
 |
|
Sponsored Links
|
|
 |
Bored w/Out Me?
Elite Member
Joined: Apr 15 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 59369
|
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: Mar 12 2013 at 11:10pm |
|
Ooooooh I hope she wins She deserve it, She was just as Happy as can be livin in that motel being saved by JESUS from that fire. Give it to her...
|
 |
modelbusiness82
Elite Member
Joined: May 21 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 44706
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Mar 12 2013 at 11:04pm |
|
I saw this on FB. About the lawsuit I mean. She has no grounds against Apple, but if she can prove that she didn't give authorization and sign a waiver to any rights to the parts sampled of her, she's definitely entitled to withheld royalties from the radio station that decided to remix and sell the track on iTunes.
|
 |
carolina cutie
Platinum Member
Joined: Jun 28 2006
Location: StrwberryFields
Status: Offline
Points: 188551
|
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: Mar 12 2013 at 10:58pm |
ms_wonderland wrote:
@ 15 million dollars. |
Lawd Jesus it's a fi-yur lawsuit! I ain't mad.
|
 |
jonesable
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 12 2010
Location: SC
Status: Offline
Points: 213636
|
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: Mar 12 2013 at 10:57pm |
|
Damn I'm hoping for a Sweet Brown come up. If not 15 milly then something. I like her
|
 |
tropical-punch
Elite Member
Joined: Dec 03 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 48379
|
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: Mar 12 2013 at 10:56pm |
 you mean to tell me, her real name is not Sweet Brown?
|
 |
ShadyLady
VIP Member
Joined: Sep 11 2011
Location: US-Florida
Status: Offline
Points: 66160
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Mar 12 2013 at 10:00pm |
|
I wonder why she told K. Foxx that Sweet Brown was her real name that her mother gave her if her name is Kimberly Wilkins.
Oh well, get ya money girl. It damn sure won't be $15 million, but every little bit counts.
|
 |
melikey
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 03 2006
Location: venus
Status: Offline
Points: 60275
|
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: Mar 12 2013 at 9:45pm |
wow, if they made money using her voice without her permission then it seems like she's entitled to something. if they were just making fun and didn't sell it i don't think she'd be entitled to anything.
|
 |
ms_wonderland
Elite Member
Joined: Apr 05 2009
Location: TTT
Status: Offline
Points: 180329
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Mar 12 2013 at 9:42pm |
 @ 15 million dollars.
|
 |
*Belle*Femme*
Elite Member
Joined: Nov 25 2008
Location: Seychelles
Status: Offline
Points: 132546
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Mar 12 2013 at 9:39pm |
|
|
 |