| Author |
|
zsazsa
Elite Member
Joined: Apr 11 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 31858
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 29 2013 at 5:12pm |
Naturalchick30 wrote:
EPITOME wrote:
parental involvement is important but a child's performance in school is contingent upon their school, their teacher, resources available...etc |
This |
i honestly believe that if a child wants to succeed, they will, regardless of the type of school they go to. if anything, parent input is what will make them succeed. parents doing the basics such as checking homework, signing book diaries, reading together (even 15mins a day), showing their faces at school, calling here and there on the phone for progress report, etc can make a difference. the parent does not even need to be educated to do all that...it is actually minimal input.
in low income areas they have so many FREE after school stuff where the parents can really take advantage but they rarely don't. i don't understand why. it's a win-win situation...send the child to learn, have some free time to yourself instead of letting your child run amok on streets.
|
 |
|
Sponsored Links
|
|
 |
nicks_hotmama06
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 07 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4347
|
Post Options
Thanks(2)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 30 2013 at 11:14pm |
|
My aunt had a student who was sick. They called her mother to come and get her. Her mother objected to coming because she said she was spending time with her boyfriend and the girl would get in the way of that. My aunt said the woman lives on assistance. Does he not realize that a LOT of kids have stupid parents? Are they supposed to starve and be under a bridge because of something they have no control over?
|
 |
Flowing-Ice
Elite Member
Joined: Feb 27 2010
Location: Fanm Sa Move
Status: Offline
Points: 96313
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 30 2013 at 11:20pm |
texasmami0117 wrote:
Its going to cost more money to implement a law like this than the money they would be saving from cutting benefits |
i don't see that as the point. the point would be for children to have the education to not fall into the cycle. and for that, i wouldn't mind them spending money.
|
 |
**Sk!TtLeS B**
Elite Member
Joined: Jul 14 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 146910
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 30 2013 at 11:21pm |
|
....so, what's going to happen to the children if these families lose their welfare benefits?
|
 |
Flowing-Ice
Elite Member
Joined: Feb 27 2010
Location: Fanm Sa Move
Status: Offline
Points: 96313
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 30 2013 at 11:22pm |
but this is about the grades. not if they have bad/good teachers. and if they aren't getting the grades, a parent might be more concerned to actually see progress by going to those teacher meetings, and finding out why their student is doing all they can in the classroom... but getting sucky grades.
|
 |
NARSAddict
Elite Member
Joined: Nov 20 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 16576
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 30 2013 at 11:28pm |
|
If this law/provision passes, I would a expect a uptick in crime. Plus does this law takes into account if the student school is adequately funded and has access to free to low cost tutors? I mean a teacher can only do so much within a x amount of hours in the day.
|
 |
nicks_hotmama06
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 07 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4347
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 30 2013 at 11:29pm |
|
Quote is not working......
Edited by nicks_hotmama06 - Jan 30 2013 at 11:35pm
|
 |
Flowing-Ice
Elite Member
Joined: Feb 27 2010
Location: Fanm Sa Move
Status: Offline
Points: 96313
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 30 2013 at 11:32pm |
NARSAddict wrote:
If this law/provision passes, I would a expect a uptick in crime. Plus does this law takes into account if the student school is adequately funded and has access to free to low cost tutors? I mean a teacher can only do so much within a x amount of hours in the day.
|
IMO. students aren't likely to be self-motivated. especially if they come from certain situations. so even providing those tutors, with no one signing up for it can be an issue.
i also think this could cut down on students who skip class without their parent's knowledge. why an uptick in crime?
|
 |
tropical-punch
Elite Member
Joined: Dec 03 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 47463
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 30 2013 at 11:46pm |
|
what a weight to bear
|
 |
modelbusiness82
Elite Member
Joined: May 21 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 36575
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 30 2013 at 11:49pm |
EPITOME wrote:
im convinced law makers are not that smart |
This...welfare
isn't an automatic ticket to failure. I know plenty of people who grew
up on welfare who did well in school and went on to get off the system
and be "productive members" of society. ETA: I also knew/know plenty of well-to-do's who were total academic bums. In other words, financial circumstances have NOTHING to do with someone's ability to do well in school. Now, actual parenting skills do.
Edited by modelbusiness82 - Jan 30 2013 at 11:51pm
|
 |