thoughts on how this hoodrat was handled

modelbusiness82 wrote: Yikes...there's so much going wrong there. SMH...getting her kids to go in on the chanting is a fail. If he really felt she was being too much of an issue, he should have just called the cops. Security guard doesn't equal POLICE. So, if a police officer chose to use a taser or some kind of force to restrain her, that's one thing, but a security guard? That vid was confusing...all I saw was two wayward women (one of them pregnant with the next of what looked like 5 kids between her and her friend), children that are already on the path to failure, and a store full of white shirts. And the dude who got pissed at the end, if that was his baby's mama...shouldn't he have come to her defense a long time ago. Ratchet. Nothing funny about that video.

I laughed and I laughed and I don't even gad... she and her friend should have gon' someplace instead of acting a fool

mrshairdo wrote: modelbusiness82 wrote: Yikes...there's so much going wrong there. SMH...getting her kids to go in on the chanting is a fail. If he really felt she was being too much of an issue, he should have just called the cops. Security guard doesn't equal POLICE. So, if a police officer chose to use a taser or some kind of force to restrain her, that's one thing, but a security guard? That vid was confusing...all I saw was two wayward women (one of them pregnant with the next of what looked like 5 kids between her and her friend), children that are already on the path to failure, and a store full of white shirts. And the dude who got pissed at the end, if that was his baby's mama...shouldn't he have come to her defense a long time ago. Ratchet. Nothing funny about that video. yea but obviously as a security guard he was given that taser or do you think it was just in his back pocket for fun?

My point is in a normal situation, the burden of proof is on a security guard to explain why they used force. It doesn't apply so much in this situation because from the surveilance camera on his vest or whatever, she clearly was an aggressor, and sadly when you sound and act like that, no judge/jury is going to give you the benefit of the doubt. However, had he tased someone who wasn't caping hard for a bad black stereotype, he'd have a lawsuit on his hands potentially.

Now, had he been a cop, the assumption would be that the cop felt threatened, had to do something less than use a gun to subdue an aggressive person. And the burden of proof would be on the WOMAN to prove that she wasn't doing anything to incite violence.

What training does the security guard have to show that he knows how to properly discharge a firearm or use a tazer? The fact that he verbally engaged her for as long as he did is already a bit of a fail in a court of law. He should have subdued the situation so that this vid wasn't 4 min. I guarantee you cops wouldn't have played with her for 4 minutes. The minute she hopped up in their face, her ass would have been arrested and we'd be looking at her mug shots.

not watching todaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay

modelbusiness82 wrote: mrshairdo wrote: modelbusiness82 wrote: Yikes...there's so much going wrong there. SMH...getting her kids to go in on the chanting is a fail. If he really felt she was being too much of an issue, he should have just called the cops. Security guard doesn't equal POLICE. So, if a police officer chose to use a taser or some kind of force to restrain her, that's one thing, but a security guard? That vid was confusing...all I saw was two wayward women (one of them pregnant with the next of what looked like 5 kids between her and her friend), children that are already on the path to failure, and a store full of white shirts. And the dude who got pissed at the end, if that was his baby's mama...shouldn't he have come to her defense a long time ago. Ratchet. Nothing funny about that video. yea but obviously as a security guard he was given that taser or do you think it was just in his back pocket for fun? My point is in a normal situation, the burden of proof is on a security guard to explain why they used force. It doesn't apply so much in this situation because from the surveilance camera on his vest or whatever, she clearly was an aggressor, and sadly when you sound and act like that, no judge/jury is going to give you the benefit of the doubt. However, had he tased someone who wasn't caping hard for a bad black stereotype, he'd have a lawsuit on his hands potentially. Now, had he been a cop, the assumption would be that the cop felt threatened, had to do something less than use a gun to subdue an aggressive person. And the burden of proof would be on the WOMAN to prove that she wasn't doing anything to incite violence. What training does the security guard have to show that he knows how to properly discharge a firearm or use a tazer? The fact that he verbally engaged her for as long as he did is already a bit of a fail in a court of law. He should have subdued the situation so that this vid wasn't 4 min. I guarantee you cops wouldn't have played with her for 4 minutes. The minute she hopped up in their face, her ass would have been arrested and we'd be looking at her mug shots.