Black Hair Media Forum Homepage
BHM BHM BHM
CoCo Black Hair
Forum Home Forum Home > Lets Talk > Talk, Talk, and More Talk
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Think Pink- The Sexualization of Breast Cancer
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login
Extensions Plus
 

Topic ClosedThink Pink- The Sexualization of Breast Cancer

 
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>
It Always Begin With Beautiful Hair

Premier Lace Wigs

Mynx Hair

Author
carolina cutie View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: Jun 28 2006
Location: StrwberryFields
Status: Offline
Points: 337359
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Think Pink- The Sexualization of Breast Cancer
    Posted: Oct 03 2011 at 5:51pm

Think About Pink

By PEGGY ORENSTEIN

A friend of mine’s 12-year-old daughter has taken to wearing a bracelet, one of those rubber, Lance Armstrong-style affairs, that says on it, “I ❤ Boobies.”

“Oh, yeah,” she said, vaguely, when questioned about it. “It’s for breast cancer.”

Really? 

It’s hard to remember that, not so long ago, the phrase “breast cancer” was not something women spoke aloud, even among themselves. It wasn’t until the early 1970s, with the high-profile diagnoses of the former child star Shirley Temple Black, the first lady Betty Ford and Happy Rockefeller that the disease went public. A short time later, Betty Rollin, an NBC-TV correspondent, published the groundbreaking memoir “First You Cry.” Back then, her grief over losing her breast and the blow cancer dealt to her sex life was greeted with hostility by some critics and dismissed as frivolous. Mammography was just coming into use to detect early-stage tumors. The American Cancer Society was still resisting the idea of support groups for post-mastectomy patients. A woman like Rollin, some said, was supposed to be grateful that she qualified for a radical mastectomy, stuff a sock in her bra and get on with it.

Fast-forward to today, when, especially during October, everything from toilet paper to buckets of fried chicken to the chin straps of N.F.L. players look as if they have been steeped in Pepto. If the goal was “awareness,” that has surely been met — largely, you could argue, because corporations recognized that with virtually no effort (and often minimal monetary contribution), going pink made them a lot of green.

But a funny thing happened on the way to destigmatization. The experience of actual women with cancer, women like Rollin, Black, Ford and Rockefeller — women like me — got lost. Rather than truly breaking silences, acceptable narratives of coping emerged, each tied up with a pretty pink bow. There were the pink teddy bears that, as Barbara Ehrenreich observed, infantilized patients in a reassuringly feminine fashion. “Men diagnosed with prostate cancer do not receive gifts of Matchbox cars,” she wrote in her book “Bright-Sided.”

Alternatively, there are what Gayle Sulik, author of “Pink Ribbon Blues,” calls “She-roes” — rhymes with “heroes.” These aggressive warriors in heels kick cancer’s butt (and look fab doing it). Like the bear huggers, they say what people want to hear: that not only have they survived cancer, but the disease has made them better people and better women. She-roes, it goes without saying, do not contract late-stage disease, nor do they die.

That rubber bracelet is part of a newer, though related, trend: the sexualization of breast cancer. Hot breast cancer. Saucy breast cancer. Titillating breast cancer! The pain of “First You Cry” has been replaced by the celebration of “Crazy Sexy Cancer,” the title of a documentary about a woman “looking for a cure and finding her life.”

Sassy retail campaigns have sprung up everywhere, purporting to “support the cause.” There is Save the Ta-Tas (a line that includes T-shirts and a liquid soap called Boob Lube), Save Second Base, Project Boobies (the slogan on its T-shirts promoting self-exam reads, “I grab a feel so cancer can’t steal,” though the placement of its hot-pink handprints makes it virtually impossible for them to belong to the shirt’s wearer). There is the coy Save the Girls campaign, whose T-shirt I saw in the window of my local Y.M.C.A. And there is “I ❤ Boobies” itself, manufactured by an organization called Keep a Breast (get it?).

Sexy breast cancer tends to focus on the youth market, but beyond that, its agenda is, at best, mushy. The Keep a Breast Foundation, according to its Web site, aims to “help eradicate breast cancer by exposing young people to methods of prevention, early detection and support.” If only it were that simple. It also strives to make discussion of cancer “positive and upbeat.” Several other groups dedicate a (typically unspecified) portion of their profits to “educate” about self-exam, though there is little evidence of its efficacy. Or they erroneously tout mammography as “prevention.”

There’s no question that many women, myself included, experience breast cancer as an assault on our femininity. Feeling sexual in the wake of mastectomy, lumpectomy, radiation or chemo is a struggle, one that may or may not result in a new, deeper understanding of yourself. While Betty Rollin acknowledged such visceral feelings about breasts, she never reduced herself to them. And in the 1990s, the fashion model Matuschka’s notorious photo of her own mastectomy scar (published on the cover of this magazine) demanded that the viewer, like breast-­cancer patients themselves, confront and even find beauty in the damage.

By contrast, today’s fetishizing of breasts comes at the expense of the bodies, hearts and minds attached to them. Forget Save the Ta-Tas: how about save the woman? How about “I ❤ My 72-Year-Old One-Boobied Granny?” After all, statistically, that’s whose “second base” is truly at risk.

Rather than being playful, which is what these campaigns are after, sexy cancer suppresses discussion of real cancer, rendering its sufferers — the ones whom all this is supposed to be for — invisible. It also reinforces the idea that breasts are the fundamental, defining aspect of femininity. My friend’s daughter may have been uncertain about what her bracelet “for breast cancer” meant, but I am betting she got that femininity equation loud and clear.

I hate to be a buzz kill, but breast cancer is just not sexy. It’s not ennobling. It’s not a feminine rite of passage. And, though it pains me to say it, it’s also not very much fun. I get that the irreverence is meant to combat crisis fatigue, the complacency brought on by the annual onslaught of pink, yet it similarly risks turning people cynical. By making consumers feel good without actually doing anything meaningful, it discourages understanding, undermining the search for better detection, safer treatments, causes and cures for a disease that still afflicts 250,000 women annually (and speaking of figures, the number who die has remained unchanged — hovering around 40,000 — for more than a decade).

As for me, I bear in mind the final statement that a college pal of mine who was dying of breast cancer (last October, in the midst of all that sexy pink) made to her younger brother. She was about to leave two young sons to grow up without a mother; her husband to muddle through without his wife. She could barely speak at the time, barely breathe. But when her brother leaned forward, she whispered two words in his ear: “This sucks.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/14/magazine/14FOB-wwln-t.html?pagewanted=print

Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
kkscottdale View Drop Down
Elite Member
Elite Member
Avatar

Joined: Mar 30 2008
Location: ATL
Status: Offline
Points: 36528
Direct Link To This Post Posted: Oct 03 2011 at 5:55pm
I think these campaigns make breast cancer more known. So many people know about breast cancer compared to other cancers, like ovarian or penis.

So, save the ta ta campaigns. Author sounds bitter.
Back to Top
afrokock View Drop Down
Elite Member
Elite Member
Avatar

Joined: May 19 2008
Location: South London
Status: Offline
Points: 1266523
Direct Link To This Post Posted: Oct 03 2011 at 6:01pm
shock and awe...


every year we go through this..

breast cancer in younger women is on the increase who still view their bodies in a very sexual manner,

should they be omitted for the sake of pc'ness?

there are so many bc cancer campaigns focusing on the ones that target the younger demographic alone is wrong

Back to Top
**Sk!TtLeS B** View Drop Down
Elite Member
Elite Member
Avatar

Joined: Jul 14 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 182778
Direct Link To This Post Posted: Oct 03 2011 at 6:03pm
Originally posted by kkscottdale kkscottdale wrote:

I think these campaigns make breast cancer more known. So many people know about breast cancer compared to other cancers, like ovarian or penis.

So, save the ta ta campaigns. Author sounds bitter.


I wouldnt necessarily say that they're bitter, because I dont expect them to be joyous while cancer ridden, however I do agree with you.

True, the topic has been sexualized as most things involving women do, but you cant deny that the younger generations would be largely ignorant of breast cancer if it werent for "Save the TaTas" or "I <3 Boobies." And dammit, I do love boobies!!!
Back to Top
PRnena View Drop Down
Elite Member
Elite Member
Avatar

Joined: Nov 03 2009
Location: BHM
Status: Offline
Points: 46481
Direct Link To This Post Posted: Oct 03 2011 at 6:04pm
They mad

Shut up. Its for a good cause. Smh
Back to Top
india100 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: Feb 19 2008
Location: in God's hand
Status: Offline
Points: 156142
Direct Link To This Post Posted: Oct 03 2011 at 6:06pm
Lost my cousin at very young age . After billions of dollars in research woman die daily . Cry In my personal op , I think our process , chemically produce foods are a great contributor to the increase of breast cancer .  
Back to Top
joy6899 View Drop Down
Elite Member
Elite Member
Avatar

Joined: Aug 23 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 17684
Direct Link To This Post Posted: Oct 03 2011 at 6:06pm
when i noticed all that, save the ta tas and i love boobies... It took a second to realize it was for breast cancer.

I think it does take away from the seriousness of the cause, but hey....they like it, i love it...so 

whatever.
Back to Top
TrillScott View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Avatar

Joined: Aug 29 2010
Location: Flygeria Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 13527
Direct Link To This Post Posted: Oct 03 2011 at 6:08pm
Idk...Afro is right. I remember being in the hospital with my aunt who had it and one of the nurses was like they had 16 year old girls coming in there with it. It was flabbergasting to say the least. Anything to get the word out is good. My aunt died when she was 31 years old from it. It's not something just older post menopausal women get anymore. If things like I love boobies makes people more aware then I'm all for it.
Back to Top
yaya24 View Drop Down
Elite Member
Elite Member
Avatar

Joined: Apr 21 2008
Location: Bliss ♥.♥.♥
Status: Offline
Points: 56072
Direct Link To This Post Posted: Oct 03 2011 at 6:08pm
I like the campaign
 
Back to Top
ThoughtCouture View Drop Down
Elite Member
Elite Member
Avatar

Joined: Jun 08 2006
Location: southside holla
Status: Offline
Points: 249494
Direct Link To This Post Posted: Oct 03 2011 at 6:10pm
i have a breast cancer awareness tee shirt that says "save the tatas"...
Back to Top
Sunwell
China Lace Wigs
Get Healthier Stronger Longer Hair
Netwurks Xcel21
Human Hair Wigs
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down