Black Hair Media Forum Homepage
BHM BHM BHM
Forum Home Forum Home > Lets Talk > Talk, Talk, and More Talk
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Ta-Nehisi Coates makes "The Case for Reparations"
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login
 

Ta-Nehisi Coates makes "The Case for Reparations"

 
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12






Author
 Rating: Topic Rating: 2 Votes, Average 5.00  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Alias_Avi View Drop Down
Elite Member
Elite Member
Avatar

Joined: Oct 10 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 272654
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Alias_Avi Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2014 at 1:22am
Thnx for posting the video Oodles


This Gawker article is somewhat of a summary for those of you who don't have the time to read it entirely yet

Originally posted by <a href=http://gawker.com/ta-nehisi-coatess-essay-on-reparations-is-a-heartbreake-1580025969 target=_blank rel=nofollow>Gawker</a> Gawker wrote:

Ta-Nehisi Coates's Essay on Reparations Is A Heartbreaker


Ta-Nehisi Coatess Essay on Reparations Is A Heartbreaker

A few weeks ago, in the middle of a rhetorical battle he was already very clearly winning, The Atlantic's Ta-Nehisi Coates published a long, lovely piece called "The Blue Period: An Origin Story." In it, he remarked that "historians are heartbreakers." I thought of that remark last night when he published a long, long piece, "The Case For Reparations," that is clearly the result of that sort of heartbreak, too.

You must read it yourself. No, really, you must. The essay's length—more than 15,000 words—makes it difficult to absorb all at once, but the length is plainly part of the point. Coates' "case for reparations" is a case about the cumulative effect of a long, winding history of discrimination. Condensing it, summarizing, can't convey the weight of it. Because reparations are about more than money:

Reparations—by which I mean the full acceptance of our collective biography and its consequences—is the price we must pay to see ourselves squarely. The recovering alcoholic may well have to live with his illness for the rest of his life. But at least he is not living a drunken lie. Reparations beckons us to reject the intoxication of hubris and see America as it is—the work of fallible humans.

Now, we all know that for some reason the very word "reparations" seems to cause a kind of meltdown in (white) Americans that very much prevents them from looking at their share of what Coates calls "our collective biography." As one of his sources tells him, "People who talk about reparations are considered left lunatics." Defensiveness reduces everything very quickly to the personal: My family never owned slaves, I personally grew up poor, etc, etc. Everything becomes a matter of the distance of the present day from slavery, as if the second slavery was abolished, all institutional racism in America went with it.

Coates could have written a polemic chiding such people but he is not that kind of writer. He has the soul of a historian, not a theorist. Where others might write paragraphs of abstract statement about the ills of slavery, he drops:

Just as a homeowner today might subscribe to a magazine like This Old House, slaveholders had journals such as De Bow's Review, which recommended the best practices for wringing profits from slaves.

In fact, though, he doesn't even spend as much time on slavery as he does on the forms and institutions that white supremacy and enforced inequality took on afterward. Coates extends its tentacles beyond lynching and Jim Crow, too, striking at the heart of the American liberalism, FDR's New Deal policies:

The omnibus programs passed under the Social Security Act in 1935 were crafted in such a way as to protect the southern way of life. Old-age insurance (Social Security proper) and unemployment insurance excluded farmworkers and domestics—jobs heavily occupied by blacks. When President Roosevelt signed Social Security into law in 1935, 65 percent of African Americans nationally and between 70 and 80 percent in the South were ineligible. The NAACP protested, calling the new American safety net "a sieve with holes just big enough for the majority of Negroes to fall through."

The backbone of the essay is the story of Clyde Ross, a son of sharecroppers in Mississippi who got out of the Jim Crow South only to find himself agitating for the rights of homeowners against the predatory "contract sale" economy in Chicago. Coates does not mince words about the way that federal policies created that opportunity to exploit black would-be homeowners:

The federal government concurred. It was the Home Owners' Loan Corporation, not a private trade association, that pioneered the practice of redlining, selectively granting loans and insisting that any property it insured be covered by a restrictive covenant—a clause in the deed forbidding the sale of the property to anyone other than whites. Millions of dollars flowed from tax coffers into segregated white neighborhoods.

Coates takes that trail right up to the present day, charting the way Ross's neighborhood in Chicago still suffers from the years of overt discrimination and "redlining."

Though Coates does not indulge in the cliché of quoting Faulkner's "The past is never dead. It's not even past," that is the mood that suffuses the whole piece. He is calling for a discussion about reparations rather than those reparations themselves. He notes, glumly, that Rep. John Conyers of Michigan has been putting a bill in from of Congress for years simply asking for a study, to no avail. The bill, like Coates' essay, does not demand "one red cent." But even just talking about this issue is foreclosed.

Is it even possible for this essay to be the speech act that will break that taboo? I'm not even sure Coates expects that, because so much of what he reports here suggests that this is not a problem a single essay can solve. Like his historians, he must know that insisting on the harder truths now makes him a heartbreaker, too.



Edited by Alias_Avi - May 25 2014 at 1:25am
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
jonesable View Drop Down
Elite Member
Elite Member
Avatar

Joined: Oct 12 2010
Location: SC
Status: Offline
Points: 285896
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jonesable Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2014 at 1:45am
I had read before about Wells Fargo and their racist predatory lending.



This country is sickening
Back to Top
Alias_Avi View Drop Down
Elite Member
Elite Member
Avatar

Joined: Oct 10 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 272654
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Alias_Avi Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2014 at 2:09am
I loved the way he layed out his case

Brilliant to personalize the case by following one African American practically throughout the depth of the history of Black exploitation



On Clyde Ross on his "losses", this broke my heart... Cry

Then, when Ross was 10 years old, a group of white men demanded his only childhood possession—the horse with the red coat. “You can’t have this horse. We want it,” one of the white men said. They gave Ross’s father $17.

“I did everything for that horse,” Ross told me. “Everything. And they took him. Put him on the racetrack. I never did know what happened to him after that, but I know they didn’t bring him back. So that’s just one of my losses.”



and this (in regards to signing that shady deal with a YT contract seller for his North Lawndale home)... Cry

“We were ashamed. We did not want anyone to know that we were that ignorant,” Ross told me. He was sitting at his dining-room table. His glasses were as thick as his Clarksdale drawl. “I’d come out of Mississippi where there was one mess, and come up here and got in another mess. So how dumb am I? I didn’t want anyone to know how dumb I was.

“When I found myself caught up in it, I said, ‘How? I just left this mess. I just left no laws. And no regard. And then I come here and get cheated wide open.’ I would probably want to do some harm to some people, you know, if I had been violent like some of us. I thought, ‘Man, I got caught up in this stuff. I can’t even take care of my kids.’ I didn’t have enough for my kids. You could fall through the cracks easy fighting these white people. And no law.”






Edited by Alias_Avi - May 25 2014 at 2:10am
Back to Top
K_Camille View Drop Down
Elite Member
Elite Member
Avatar

Joined: Sep 14 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 32859
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote K_Camille Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2014 at 11:43am
I haven't finished reading yet but great topic! Star
Back to Top
Get Longer Healthier Faster Growing Hair
House of CB London
Get Healthier Stronger Longer Hair
The Elite Hair Care Sorority
Electric Cherry Hair
Hair Extensions Wefted Hair Wigs and More
Human Hair Wigs
Wefting Training
Dime Curves Enhancement Shake
Brazilian Hair
Brazilian Hair
Switch Up your Look with a protective Style
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down