spinoff : Feminine hygiene

I worked with a lady that got drunk, went home with some guy, forgot she had on a tampon and had sex.

Edited by Rumbera - Jan 14 2013 at 2:38pm

well, you can't be typing all self righteous after you've sat around with brown discharge for a week and be kikiking about it in a thread like it was no biggie.  if you don't care about your vagina then i don't care about your feelings when you act crazy.

ShadyLady wrote: SweetNovember* wrote: ShadyLady wrote: Summary...let's see... -SN still being suspected as being Star -SN started arguing back and forth with Wonder, Jones, and Midna cuz she felt people were mad she said her coochie is tight -Wonder stepped on a landmine by asking about tampons being left in pum-pums for a long period of time (says she was unaware of Star/tampon story -Original Star/tampon thread is resurrected, link and all (thanks Sang!) -SN proceeds to argue she is not Star, defend the right to discuss the tightness of her coochie -SN says the convo is over and she's letting it go more than once -But keeps coming back with new rebuttals -Convo moves on to childbirth and other such things -But SN keeps coming back...keeps coming back -Luckily the convo dies when ppl remind SN she is supposed to be letting it go, and everyone she was arguing with pretty much start to ignore her Might have missed some gems, but you get the point lol. This "summary" is incredibly biased which is to be expected so I'll only correct three points. 1) I made a joke about my puzzy being tight and people obviously felt slighted because they called me sad and ignorant about kegels after I said it was a joke. That is indeed mad behavior. 2) The people who I was talking to were talking back to me and people who I weren't even talking to were talking to me. So I'm not sure when anyone started ignoring me. 3) Wonderland let jonesable boost her up into making a reference to starflower's puzzy situation (then jonesable tried to hide her hand) and Wonderland made a cross reference back to MY puzzy being loose which she admitted was blatantly directed at me (so why are people saying it was an accident...lol...bold faced lies). So once again we have what either looks like someone being mad, or just trying to be internet famous. Probably both. Technically, you corrected nothing since I never said the opposite of anything you said. 1) I never said you weren't joking. You said what you said, someone made a comment about it, and said they were mad you said your coochie was tight...exactly as I stated in the summary. 2) Like I said, the convo had moved on to childbirth and whatnot. Even Jones and Wonder were participating in THAT convo, but you kept going with the mad/loose coochie/bowel movements crap. Even when Wonder said she was done, you tried to turn that into an argument about how she only stopped talking to you cuz she had nothing to say. 3) I clearly said she SAID she didn't know about the tampon issue, not that she accidentally bought it up. I have no problem with you, and it wasn't my intention for my unofficial summary to seem "biased" as you put it. I just stated what happened from MY perception.

Okay, fine.

1) You said I was arguing but you conveniently left out them calling me "sad" "If I that that increases my value." I said the summary was biased because after I said it was a joke and people insulted me you still made it seem like I was the one started arguments. You left out their insults and you left out me stating that what I said was a joke.

2) People did start talking about childbirth in some post and people were still talking about the whole coochie debacle in some posts as well. You make it seem as though people can only talk about one topic at a time. Every post I made was in response to people talking about that. I didn't respond to anyone talking about childbirth. People were still talking to me and I definitely stopped talking to Wonderland until she came back but still wasn't being real.

3) You said that she said she didn't know but you didn't explain how obvious it was that the whole things was planned for pages and bucked up by different people until she finally let on what they were talking about. A person who read your summary might really get the impression that something different took place in this thread than what actually took place.

So maybe what I posted wasn't correction per se, but rather clarification. But the thread is still here. It's pretty juicy for anyone who wants to read for themselves.