Comment from the article :
" The law is the LAW. If the husband of a married woman does NOT concent to the adoption it is NOT an adoption, period. The Frei's KNEW there was NO CONSENT. At that very moment they should have turned back.
The law is not about fitness. His rights CANNOT be terminated. The law simply does not allow for it, period. The marriage prevents that, period. He cannot be found to be an unfit parent because HE WAS NEVER ALLOWED TO PARENT by interference of the Frei's.
He was, at the time of birth, honorably serving his country in the military as active duty. As a result, federal law precludes the courts FROM terminating his rights. He was also able to prove that he was supporting his wife. he freaking PAID for the birth through his military benefits.
He didn't make contact because the baby's birth was HIDDEN from him and then he was lied to by his WIFE and the ADOPTION AGENCY.
If you cannot read the basic facts as presented, and as RULED ON BY A JUDGE, then there is simply NO HELPING YOU.
Ultimately, the baby's father DID NOTHING WRONG, the baby's mother committed fraud, the adoption agency committed fraud, and the Frei's KNOWINGLY KIDNAPPED a baby.
Learn to read before opening your mouth."