Rumor has it Jacebeautys vendor has been found...

yikes 

candytm24 wrote: You have been misinformed. Not once in my response did I ask who the vendor was. You might wanna check your reading skills because I stated that I found the info from the original posters email. Going through the pages info can be missed because a lot of other things (not related to the the topic) are discussed before and after the question is answered which is why I can understand how some may get confused. Even though the same questions have been asked you have a choice to ignore the question and not answer. No one asked for a smart remark. The whole purpose of a discussion board is to ask questions no matter the redundancy. Nice try but you dropped no knowledge here danieb23 wrote: candytm24 wrote: @Loveslace If the vendor was already posted on another Jacebeauty thread than why feel the need to correspond and comment on this topic. If the information was given than there should not have been a need for anyone to comment on how bad they were waiting for the info because if would have been discovered. Needless to say there are very minimum threads on BHM that are simply stated. This also has nothing to do with people doing a "simple search", a word that you seem to use quite often, because if the search was that simple their would be no reason as to why this thread has dragged on for 50+ pages. What I don't get is why people take the time out to comment on threads just to be petty and unhelpful. If you wanna offer advice than do just that. If the information has already been put out there how about directing those who need help to the proper avenue. If you don't want to help than no input is needed. Saying people are expecting to be spoonfed has no merit because you don't know how much research someone has done. Just because one may have a little bit more knowledge than someone else that should make you feel compelled to help because some people may have looked up and down and still may overlook something. And for the other female who commented, you must not have read through the 40 sumthn pages where no one mentioned the name of the vendor or maybe I'm just delusional. I don't think this thread would have lasted this long if the info was stated already, particularly in this thread. Well then my dear, I question your reading skills because I amongst others found the vendor in this VERY thread. Do you need to be directed to the multiple pages it was discussed on? And because you say you "think the thread wouldn't have lasted this long if the vendor was listed" let's me know that you really didn't read all the way through it. Because if you did you would know exactly what was discussed in the thread. I sat and read through it found the vendors name, what is stopping you from doing the same? There are 50billion members askin the same questions every.single.day on this board. A member will answer that question, and not even a post down someone will ask the same darn question, again. Just like it was done with you and numerous others in this thread. In the school of weaves, you will ALWAYS have questions that need to be answered. You need to be able to depend on your own research instead of having someone answer every question that a quick google search will answer in 5 seconds. You dont ask a professor to do your research for you even thought they know the answer, so why do you expect us to do the same for questions that are asked hundreds and hundreds of times and are located in this "textbook" No one is doing this to be mean and selfish, but the endless questions from members gets aggravating, and the lazy newbies that came before us made it bad for the entire future of the board. You can keep asking your questions, just don't get butthurt if noone decides to answer a questions that has been answered a handful of times before. There's asking someone to be helpful with information that is really not accessible, and then there is being too pazy to skim the last 15 pages of the thread to get the vendors name. Please direct yourself to Page 46 so you can tell me again that the vendor wasn't listed in the thread. Best of weaves luck to you.

My reading skills are fine, obviously yours are still lacking

You said the vendor wasn't listed in the thread, I directed you to a page. Seeing as you did not know this, i obviously did drop knowledge

The purpose of this board is for helpfulness, but some people need to learn to help themselves. Anyone who has a problem with that is obviously lazy and wants someone to do their research for them

And as long as you call yourself making smart remarks calling someone out,
I will do the same. Don't like it? Take your advice and ignore me, otherwise just deal with it and don`t address me like you did in your post to LovesLace post.

Best of luck in reading comprehension and research skills.

Edited by danieb23 - Dec 13 2012 at 12:04am

candytm24 wrote: choc_lover wrote: I have to agree with Loveslace. Use google. Not the search feature here. This isn't the only Jace beauty thread. And really whether or not you like Loveslace's post, she just helped you find the vendor by telling you what to do. Actually she didn't help me find anything,I found the info myself. You might wanna read through this thread before you try to hop on the Loveslace bandwagon. I don't need any assistance researching and I'm not the one who asked for help.

Congratulations.
Like I said earlier, I never mentioned you or directed any posts to you. You might not have needed the info but I'm sure someone else did.


Edited by choc_lover - Dec 12 2012 at 11:54pm

Kami612 wrote: You know what else is getting old? People asking the same a*s questions but not contributing to the forum. Want links & names to all of the "good" vendors" but don't help other members, don't actually discover any new vendors or post pics. They want all the info & links in the world without actually ever being a participating active member. GTFOH.

Truuuuuuuuue *2chainz*

candytm24 wrote: Actually my post was very helpful, I guarantee you several people found my post to be helpful. I answered the question that some were looking for, unlike you. Being that you were the one to respond you must have felt that I was referring to you which proves my point. Again, find something else to say besides "a simple google search" that sh*t is getting old. If someone wants to ask a redundant question that has been answered before, guess what, thats what a forum is for open discussion and feedback. Give helpful advice or otherwise no input is needed.

To answer a question that has been answered several times is not helpful but redundant.