| Author |
|
JoliePoufiasse 
Elite Member
Joined: Jul 20 2011
Location: SupaFlyKingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 179615
|
 Posted: Jun 24 2014 at 3:26pm |
|
There are cases when that person needs to be put out on front street. Like the instances I pointed out initially. There are swindlers out there, or men who like to spread HIV and what not. I maintain that unless the allegations are unsubstantiated or criminal, the law shouldn't interfere.
|
 |
|
Sponsored Links
|
|
|
ThoughtCouture
Elite Member
Joined: Jun 08 2006
Location: southside holla
Status: Offline
Points: 249492
|
Posted: Jun 24 2014 at 3:27pm |
oh yeah i know. i thought maybe this was the trend tho. so like a gag order against speaking on the truth? because if it were lies seems like there would be other ways to legally address and obtain retribution for said slander. anyway, i guess if the person wants to continue to get paid (or keep from paying), as outlined in the doc, they would agree and uphold. i guess...
|
|
PurplePhase
Platinum Member
Joined: Jun 08 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 232642
|
Posted: Jun 24 2014 at 3:30pm |
 ThoughtCouture wrote:
wait...so these clauses include no social media at all? not even shyt having nothing to do with the ex? what? |
on 2nd thought, I wouldn't mind this rule for some  . Like the couples who post to each other on FB while in the next room at home (Thanks for the glass of water you just brought me, honey. You're welcome sweetie )
|
|
ThoughtCouture
Elite Member
Joined: Jun 08 2006
Location: southside holla
Status: Offline
Points: 249492
|
Posted: Jun 24 2014 at 3:31pm |
JoliePoufiasse wrote:
There are cases when that person needs to be put out on front street. Like the instances I pointed out initially. There are swindlers out there, or men who like to spread HIV and what not. I maintain that unless the allegations are unsubstantiated or criminal, the law shouldn't interfere. |
i'm thinking this is more of a civil contractual (pre-nup) matter. meaning, the person who does the speaking would trigger the pre-nup clause that either suppresses their future payments (per the pre-nup) or causes them to have to pay the ex.
|
|
ThoughtCouture
Elite Member
Joined: Jun 08 2006
Location: southside holla
Status: Offline
Points: 249492
|
Posted: Jun 24 2014 at 3:37pm |
lol purp. i don't think i could take any man seriously who had recent habits of posting to and from his gf on social media. and especially not social media beefs. nicca what? i'm grown. 
Edited by ThoughtCouture - Jun 24 2014 at 3:42pm
|
|
PurplePhase
Platinum Member
Joined: Jun 08 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 232642
|
Posted: Jun 24 2014 at 3:38pm |
|
TC, yeah I hate reading couple's spats on FB. The subliminal ones are the worst. I click 'Hide' quick on a lot of posts.
|
|
jonesable
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 12 2010
Location: SC
Status: Offline
Points: 300727
|
Posted: Jun 24 2014 at 3:39pm |
Lol I dont like that either Purp.
My older sister does it and I tell her I hate it.
She just posts more lol
|
|
JoliePoufiasse
Elite Member
Joined: Jul 20 2011
Location: SupaFlyKingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 179615
|
Posted: Jun 24 2014 at 3:39pm |
ThoughtCouture wrote:
JoliePoufiasse wrote:
There are cases when that person needs to be put out on front street. Like the instances I pointed out initially. There are swindlers out there, or men who like to spread HIV and what not. I maintain that unless the allegations are unsubstantiated or criminal, the law shouldn't interfere. |
i'm thinking this is more of a civil contractual (pre-nup) matter. meaning, the person who does the speaking would trigger the pre-nup clause that either suppresses their future payments (per the pre-nup) or causes them to have to pay the ex. |
TC, I read that twice. In other words, you talk about him, you lose money, right? I would be pissed at being forbidden to speak about years of my own life though. And my own life would include my former mate. I understand the intent of the clause but whoever uses it better be mighty specific because that opens the door to a lot of abuse.
|
|
PurplePhase
Platinum Member
Joined: Jun 08 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 232642
|
Posted: Jun 24 2014 at 3:43pm |
jonesable wrote:
Lol I dont like that either Purp.
My older sister does it and I tell her I hate it.
She just posts more lol |
what? the spats or the love notes? lol. Oh no! am I a curmudgeon because I hate love notes on fb!! 
|
|
Wildfire
Elite Member
Joined: May 27 2006
Location: Kingston, JA.
Status: Offline
Points: 90835
|
Posted: Jun 24 2014 at 3:45pm |
jonesable wrote:
But damn not even positive stuff?
Out to dinner with my loving husband???
Cant even post that??
Why not? |
I understand why not. any and everything is fodder on SM....the most mundane/innocent things are twisted I say keep everything about your private life out of it.
|
|
Tweet
Pre-Nups Now Include Social Media Clause
Topic Options
