| Author |
|
melikey 
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 03 2006
Location: venus
Status: Offline
Points: 100721
|
 Post Options
 Thanks(5)
 Quote  Reply
 Posted: Apr 27 2014 at 10:38am |
|
I see why the mistress recorded the rant. She wasn't bothered about the racist she was bothered that her Hard earned money was in jeopardy.
|
 |
|
Sponsored Links
|
|
|
melikey
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 03 2006
Location: venus
Status: Offline
Points: 100721
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Apr 27 2014 at 10:41am |
 jonesable wrote:
melikey wrote:
Wait, she's suing the mistress for accepting gifts?
Wouldn't it be easiest to debit those gifts from his portion of the divorce settlement? |
The way it works is the court orders the receiver of those gifts to return them back to the marital pot so it can be equally divided among the two |
I have never heard of this. Are there any high profile cases of this happening in the news? There would be strippers and mistresses getting sued left and right if this were the case. Hmmm
|
|
melikey
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 03 2006
Location: venus
Status: Offline
Points: 100721
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Apr 27 2014 at 10:43am |
|
Good thing Naomi cambell's ex wasn't American!
|
|
jonesable
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 12 2010
Location: SC
Status: Offline
Points: 294183
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Apr 27 2014 at 10:44am |
|
I found this from a Michigan source.
Cali is a community property state so it may be the same.
Michigan’s case law includes several court decisions reflecting the legal ramifications of giving away or dissipating assets prior to divorce. In the 1992 case of Sands v. Sands, the Michigan Court of Appeals decided to give the value of all a spouse’s dissipated assets to the injured spouse. In the 1991 case of Thames v. Thames, the Michigan Court of Appeals ordered the individual who received the marital property to return it to the marital estate so a judge could divide it in the divorce. Judges can and will order an uneven division of property to the wronged spouse to compensate for the wrongdoing. If enough marital property doesn’t exist to adequately compensate her, Michigan law allows judges to “invade” a husband's separate property under some circumstances and order it transferred to his spouse. Separate property is generally anything a spouse owned before marriage or acquired through gift or inheritance
|
|
jonesable
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 12 2010
Location: SC
Status: Offline
Points: 294183
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Apr 27 2014 at 10:46am |
|
Where is Rohan isn't he part of the legal crew?
|
|
rohan
VIP Member
Joined: Mar 23 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 8224
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Apr 27 2014 at 10:50am |
jonesable wrote:
Where is Rohan isn't he part of the legal crew?
|
Haha, nah, I don't know anything about this stuff. It's riveting to watch though. 
|
|
melikey
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 03 2006
Location: venus
Status: Offline
Points: 100721
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Apr 27 2014 at 10:53am |
jonesable wrote:
I found this from a Michigan source.
Cali is a community property state so it may be the same.
Michigan’s case law includes several court decisions reflecting the legal ramifications of giving away or dissipating assets prior to divorce. In the 1992 case of Sands v. Sands, the Michigan Court of Appeals decided to give the value of all a spouse’s dissipated assets to the injured spouse. In the 1991 case of Thames v. Thames, the Michigan Court of Appeals ordered the individual who received the marital property to return it to the marital estate so a judge could divide it in the divorce. Judges can and will order an uneven division of property to the wronged spouse to compensate for the wrongdoing. If enough marital property doesn’t exist to adequately compensate her, Michigan law allows judges to “invade” a husband's separate property under some circumstances and order it transferred to his spouse. Separate property is generally anything a spouse owned before marriage or acquired through gift or inheritance |
Ok so if I'm reading correctly unequally dividing is valid if there's enough money left to do so as well as going after the spouses personal property.
|
|
JoliePoufiasse
Elite Member
Joined: Jul 20 2011
Location: SupaFlyKingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 162794
|
Post Options
Thanks(2)
Quote Reply
Posted: Apr 27 2014 at 10:56am |
|
As nasty as she is for laying down with that crusty piece of mold, she earned those car and that apartment. Jesus, what she subjected herself to willingly for a little change and then to have to lose the benefits? That's a compelling argument for suicide.
|
|
mrshairdo
Elite Member
Joined: May 21 2009
Location: your dreams
Status: Offline
Points: 146466
|
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: Apr 27 2014 at 10:56am |
Gkisses wrote:
Yall would be calling that girl gorg if she was a member. ..
I may or may not be trying to start summin |
of course they would!
|
|
ThatGurlD
Elite Member
Joined: Dec 09 2008
Location: Washington
Status: Offline
Points: 44470
|
Post Options
Thanks(2)
Quote Reply
Posted: Apr 27 2014 at 10:57am |
melikey wrote:
I see why the mistress recorded the rant. She wasn't bothered about the racist she was bothered that her Hard earned money was in jeopardy. |
'
|
|
Tweet
Topic Options
