What Indian Americans Can Learn During Black History Month
Author, 'BEING DIFFERENT: An Indian Challenge to Western Universalism'
February is celebrated as America's Black History Month, making it an
opportune time to examine some important relationships between the
Indian and black communities in this country. For one, there are
longstanding ties between the two peoples that ought to be unearthed and
rekindled. Mahatma Gandhi started his civil disobedience movement in
South Africa where he spent 21 years honing his political philosophy and
leadership skills. The event that became the turning point in his life
was when he was thrown off a train, because as a person of color he was
not allowed to sit in first-class even though he had a first-class
ticket. The indignity of this event, similar to that experienced by all
people of color in South Africa at that time, launched him into a life
of social and political activism. His movement culminated in the
eventual overthrow of the British Empire and colonialism in general.
Gandhi's non-violent struggle later inspired the young Dr. Martin
Luther King Jr., who studied Gandhi's civil disobedience approach known
as satyagraha, and visited India in 1959 for a month. The
details of this trip are memorably recounted in his essay, "My trip to
the land of Gandhi", published in Ebony magazine in 1959. Martin Luther King Jr. had this to say about the reception he received:
"Since our pictures were in the newspapers very often it was
not unusual for us to be recognized by crowds in public places and on
public conveyances [...] Virtually every door was open to us. We had
hundreds of invitations that limited time did not allow us to accept. We
were looked upon as brothers with the color of our skins as something
of an asset. But the strongest bond of fraternity was the common cause
of minority and colonial peoples in America, Africa and Asia struggling
to throw off racialism and imperialism".
The Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr., too, has had recurring contact with India in
all the years of his active career. In one trip he spent six months in
India prior to the Civil Rights Movement in the U.S.
Recently, in 2008, on the occasion of Gandhi's 60th death anniversary, he delivered the memorial lecture in New Delhi where he remarked,
"One can argue that Mahatma Gandhi, known as Bapu (father) to his
compatriots, was the spiritual godfather of these world-class figures
(Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Nelson Mandela) who changed the world."
Today, as Indian Americans have become established successfully in
their newly adopted country, it is easy to forget the importance of
these bonds. We must remember that the 1965 Immigration &
Nationality Act which opened the door for large numbers of Asians,
Africans and Latin Americans, was enacted against the backdrop of the
Civil Rights Movement and the changes in attitude that it created. This
reversed the previous system that was designed to maintain the European
racial composition of the United States. (to all of you who think the White population isn't an effect of White Supremacy and thus White privilege )
Immigrants from India tended to be well-educated, middle-class
professionals seeking prosperity, and they hit the ground running to
seize the opportunities. Because most Indian Americans arrived after the
Civil Rights Act, they did not experience the indignities suffered by
African Americans, and because they belonged to the post-Independence
generation of India, they hadn't experienced life under colonial rule
either. Professional success came relatively quickly to many Indians and
this dulled the impetus to appreciate the benefits of a strong
collective identity.
The long list of successful Indian Americans is impressive indeed,
but it has made many too self-centered and single-minded in economic
pursuits. Success has led to the myth that "becoming American" makes a
collective identity irrelevant. Few Indian leaders have studied the
history of immigration and identity formation of other minorities in
America. They are confused about what the hyphenated identity as
"Indian-Americans" means, and what their unique American journey and
cultural background could contribute to the fabric of this country.
The recent unceremonious dismissal of Citigroup CEO, Vikram Pandit,
despite his stellar record, should cause Indian Americans to do some
soul searching. Sadly, Pandit found himself without allies on his own
board of directors to defend him as one of their own. In fact, none of
the board members was close enough to him to even give a hint that he
was about to get fired. When he arrived at the fateful board meeting, he
had no clue of what was in store for him.
Moreover, this shocking episode went un-scrutinized by our community
that feels uncomfortable addressing its vulnerability for being
"different." Individual success, based solely on merit, has surely taken
us a long way in America. The playing field is level enough to advance
up to a point, but without the anchor and security of a collective
voice, high-achieving Indians will remain the solitary outsiders, easy
to bring down.
What does all this have to do with African Americans, one might
wonder? My response is that they have deep memory and understanding of
building community organizations in America. Black churches have
historically played a strategic role in building a positive selfhood and
collective consciousness, and today there are numerous African-American
civic organizations with depth and maturity to secure their position.
Unlike the case of Indian immigrants, theirs has not been a
quick-success journey, but a long, hard one with many valuable lessons
learned along the way.
The Reconstruction era after the emancipation of slaves had offered
many lessons to African Americans. Ostensibly, it was to be a period
when blacks and whites would together rebuild the South, share political
power and rehabilitate the former slaves. Indeed, many blacks attained
prominent positions, and two blacks were elected as senators. So they
felt little need to build separate institutions, imagining that the
American melting pot would suffice. The advances made during the
Reconstruction, however, proved to be short lived. Soon there was a
backlash against blacks and the nation entered the era of Jim Crow laws
and the rise of the Ku Klux Klan. Freedom from slavery did not mean that
whites accepted blacks as true equals in jobs and power. Equality had
its limits, especially at times when whites faced economic distress.
It was after this experience that a new kind of African-American
leadership emerged with a focus on building a resilient, independent
identity with its own institutions. Unified action was encouraged. This
groundwork ultimately led to the American Civil Rights Act in the 1960s,
just as Gandhi's struggle took nearly half a century of strenuous work
before culminating in India's independence. The African-American
experience shows us that there is no substitute for grassroots community
building and activism, an endeavor that Indian Americans have barely
begun. Whether African Americans, Jewish Americans, Hispanic Americans
or Muslim Americans, the importance of investing in robust civic
organizations based on a solid definition of one's distinct identity has
been indispensable in America.
Without such bottom-up community building, we can expect to see more Vikram Pandits, easily booted out. Or, as I wrote in my blog last week,
there will be more Bobby Jindals willing to whitewash their ethnicity
in order to get ahead. African Americans provide the experience we need
for building a distinct identity in this country. Dr. King said it best:
"The way of acquiescence leads to moral and spiritual suicide. The way
of violence leads to bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the
destroyers. But, the way of non-violence leads to redemption and the
creation of the beloved community."
|