Black Hair Media Forum Homepage
BHM BHM BHM
Forum Home Forum Home > Lets Talk > Talk, Talk, and More Talk
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - House Votes to Cut Food Stamps by 4 Billion
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login
Angkor Cambodian Hair
 

House Votes to Cut Food Stamps by 4 Billion

 
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 7891011 13>
It Always Begin With Beautiful Hair

Bootiful Cream



Author
 Rating: Topic Rating: 5 Votes, Average 3.40  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
AwesomeAries View Drop Down
Elite Member
Elite Member
Avatar

Joined: Aug 25 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 91809
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (2) Thanks(2)   Quote AwesomeAries Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Sep 20 2013 at 2:22pm
Originally posted by TheAwakenGod TheAwakenGod wrote:

Yeah, I made a few songs, but this is getting irritating, people need to take, because nothing is freely given. You need to manipulate, The Prince  by Machavelli opened my eyes and made me more successful.




You sound crazy as hell
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
maysay1 View Drop Down
Elite Member
Elite Member
Avatar

Joined: Jul 02 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 97487
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (2) Thanks(2)   Quote maysay1 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Sep 20 2013 at 2:26pm
Originally posted by Random Thoughts Random Thoughts wrote:



I get your point. Was just curious which foods/snacks counted as "extra".

I guess my main rub is the system of punishing the poor for national debt, and the implication that poor people's behavior should controlled to the point of eliminating pleasure,  i.e a kid getting some apple juice/chocolate milk at snack time, or an elderly woman on a fixed income buying some butter peacan ice cream every once in awhile.

Restricting cheap koolaid packages or dessert doesn't necessarily translate to another meal for the people that aren't necessarily health conscious to begin with. I can understand the comparison to WIC to an extent, but think there are enough differences (food budget for a baby vs food budget for an entire family, ranging from child to senior) that separate the two issues.

I just don't think food programs is where budget issues start. Just seems like more tacked on war on the poor initiatives.

Fair points all around though.



I actually agree with all of this, especially the bold, on a philosophical level. But philosophy and finances are two different things.

The more radical view would be to get rid of SNAP in its current incarnation and just provide meals that are paid for by the government (like school breakfast and lunch, but for everyone)...like a combination food bank/soup kitchen/cafeteria. We could certainly do that in a much cheaper way. But folks would be up in arms talking about how it's all kinds of wrong and inhumane to do such a thing.

It's not going to happen, but I think it's a valid solution that should be considered.
Back to Top
yurika975 View Drop Down
Elite Member
Elite Member
Avatar

Joined: Mar 08 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 27049
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (6) Thanks(6)   Quote yurika975 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Sep 20 2013 at 2:30pm
This is crazy. The biggest lie regarding these programs is that people automatically picture a black woman as the epitome of Welfare. When in actuality the truth is much paler. And much richer. Corporate welfare is the reality but people focus and scream about these stamps. I think more programs in schools on teaching how to cook and eat for health. Also having community gardens is a winner. My grandmother grew most everything to feed herself, husband and nine kids.
Back to Top
petiteone29 View Drop Down
Elite Member
Elite Member
Avatar

Joined: Jan 02 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 43188
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote petiteone29 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Sep 20 2013 at 3:27pm
Originally posted by maysay1 maysay1 wrote:

Originally posted by petiteone29 petiteone29 wrote:

Hmmm... Im still not understanding how cutting out certain foods will save money. If someone gets 300 in stamps and spends 50 of that on "luxury" foods and then they are told that those foods are no longer eligible, they would most likely still need and spend the 50 on healthier food. So in the end the same 300 gets spent.

It's about getting more meals for the same amount of money. I'd rather that $50 be spent on potatoes, frozen veggies, and eggs rather than soda and honey buns. Most people aren't (and can't) sustain themselves on honey buns and coke, but they can get several meals out of some potatoes sauteed with frozen veggies.

Originally posted by petiteone29 petiteone29 wrote:

I guess what im saying is how would we determine how much healthy food is enough to feed a family?I don't think the government is adding extra stamps in the original amount to cover the cost of junk food. They give them that amount based on income and family size. Also would the funds be distributed in the form of vouchers or something like WIC with specific items and amounts listed?





We'd determine it the same way we determine the standards for WIC, school breakfasts and lunches, hospital menus, prisoner menus and the like. We already know what/how much humans need to meet bare minimums.




ok I get what you are saying. I just think that trying to control what people eat isnt fair. It would be ideal if people spent the stamps wisely though. I see people misusing their TANF benefits all the time. Buying weave at the beauty supply store, cigs,beer, club outfits at rainbow etc instead of buying pampers and paying their rent. To me that is more of a concern. Atleast the person buying some steak and ice cream with their stamps is eating which is what stamps are meant for. 
Back to Top
kfoxx1998 View Drop Down
Elite Member
Elite Member
Avatar

Joined: Jul 06 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 116516
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (14) Thanks(14)   Quote kfoxx1998 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Sep 20 2013 at 3:36pm
Originally posted by Random Thoughts Random Thoughts wrote:


I get your point. Was just curious which foods/snacks counted as "extra".

I guess my main rub is the system of punishing the poor for national debt, and the implication that poor people's behavior should controlled to the point of eliminating pleasure,  i.e a kid getting some apple juice/chocolate milk at snack time, or an elderly woman on a fixed income buying some butter peacan ice cream every once in awhile.

Restricting cheap koolaid packages or dessert doesn't necessarily translate to another meal for the people that aren't necessarily health conscious to begin with. I can understand the comparison to WIC to an extent, but think there are enough differences (food budget for a baby vs food budget for an entire family, ranging from child to senior) that separate the two issues.

I just don't think food programs is where budget issues start. Just seems like more tacked on war on the poor initiatives.

Fair points all around though.



Ima just go on and say it sounds Orwellian.   I'm no more ready to have republicans dictate food choices than I am vaginas.  This idea is literally dangerous in the hands of the wrong people.  Treating niccas like children again.  Like they decided what to feed the slaves and the slaves had to make a meal out of it, hence chittlins and the like.

The tiny bit of taxpayer dollars that are spent on kool-aid and sugar (a very, very cheap drink mind you) is minuscule in comparison to corporate welfare.  This whole thing is completely ridiculous. 




Edited by kfoxx1998 - Sep 20 2013 at 3:38pm
Back to Top
kfoxx1998 View Drop Down
Elite Member
Elite Member
Avatar

Joined: Jul 06 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 116516
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote kfoxx1998 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Sep 20 2013 at 3:37pm
Originally posted by SamoneLenior SamoneLenior wrote:


what about sushi?



Bless you for cracking me the hell up in this pitiful ass thread LOLCryLOL


Back to Top
carolina cutie View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: Jun 28 2006
Location: StrwberryFields
Status: Offline
Points: 312078
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (3) Thanks(3)   Quote carolina cutie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Sep 20 2013 at 3:43pm
Originally posted by **Sk!TtLeS B** **Sk!TtLeS B** wrote:

Originally posted by TheAwakenGod TheAwakenGod wrote:

Originally posted by **Sk!TtLeS B** **Sk!TtLeS B** wrote:

Originally posted by TheAwakenGod TheAwakenGod wrote:


Why do you keep coming back to BHM? Nobody likes you. You're an insufferable dumbass who needs to reevaluate his personality flaws and/or disorders before attempting to interact with people. Seek help, and leave us the alone. 
 
There are a few that like me on this forum. So I don't know why you are tripping, just simply scroll pass my posts if they bother you so much. Sleepy
 
I have no personality flaws nor disorders so get in line on the haters bus.

to the first bolded: I highly doubt that. You have no redeeming qualities. 

to the second bolded: So that's why you make several usernames a year for a forum that keeps banning you? One of which was you impersonating woman? Okay.
Don't forget impersonating a woman who had been raped. Class act.

Originally posted by TheAwakenGod TheAwakenGod wrote:

I got raped............Cry



[URLhttp://forum.blackhairmedia.com/united-nations-rape-study_topic364227.html][/URL]


Edited by carolina cutie - Sep 20 2013 at 3:48pm
Back to Top
afrokock View Drop Down
Elite Member
Elite Member
Avatar

Joined: May 19 2008
Location: South London
Status: Offline
Points: 995802
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (3) Thanks(3)   Quote afrokock Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Sep 20 2013 at 3:45pm
lol

y'all still giving AWackson the time of day?



Edited by afrokock - Sep 20 2013 at 4:04pm
Back to Top
HaitianDiva64 View Drop Down
Elite Member
Elite Member
Avatar

Joined: Nov 17 2009
Location: New Yawk
Status: Offline
Points: 59595
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (2) Thanks(2)   Quote HaitianDiva64 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Sep 20 2013 at 3:59pm
They need to start with letting us grow our on garden enough to feed a fam. Isn't that illegal in oakland and other places?? They want us fat and dependent. I agree with maysay. But the only reason the gov doesn't go that route is cause thwy want us to sip kool aide and send kids to school with chips and cookies.

Even the free school lunches are unhealthy and nasty, talking bout it costs much more to prepare and serve salade and fruit than burgers and pizza
Back to Top
Az~Maverick View Drop Down
Elite Member
Elite Member
Avatar

Joined: Jan 08 2008
Location: Kronos
Status: Offline
Points: 66401
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (5) Thanks(5)   Quote Az~Maverick Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Sep 20 2013 at 4:09pm
And what supposed to come out of the money from these cuts? Build more prisons? Smh Sleepy
Back to Top
Get Longer Healthier Faster Growing Hair
Get Healthier Stronger Longer Hair
Glam Twinz
Weave Connection
Little Black Scarf
Human Hair Wigs
Wefting Training
Brazilian Hair
Brazilian Hair
Wig and Hair Extension on Amazon
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 7891011 13>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down