Gay marriages in the church??

FarraFace wrote: What is the opposite of a link?

not the opposite of a link, but that u didn't ask her to give  the link to her fallacious claims.  Cuz I'd like to see that

 

Qualified wrote: Lawd, Farra's comments on this one page are going to force me to contend with my ADD and my short ass attention span and go read this entire thread. What da hell did I miss? Also- long story shorter. The church should never, ever be forced to marry Gay couples, Idagd how progressive the times are, there are just some things that shouldnt be ammended, ever, and thats one of them.

then, summary?

TokyoRose wrote: How has bunnyah been disrespectful in this thread? I think she raised some pretty good points. Just because she does not like religion does not mean what she has to contribute to the discussion is less valuable. And it is no more disrespectful than believers freely telling non believers that they will essentially burn in hell for not believing.

There's a difference in presentation. buny dismisses and tries to invalidate people's points of view if they mention that they are religious. She also takes underhand jabs in her comments that she probably thinks people don't see but we do.
You, on the other hand, one can have a discussion with you coming out of your mouth and tucking snide remarks in between points you are making. You, Tokyo, know how to except that people have different points of views and beliefs. bunyuhhh, however, posts her points in and seemingly has a problem with understanding that everyone doesn't and won't think like her.


As for the bolded, I don't agree with anyone doing that but I also don't understand how it would be disrespectful to a non believer if they don't believe in it anyway./

ImThatDiva wrote: TokyoRose wrote: How has bunnyah been disrespectful in this thread? I think she raised some pretty good points. Just because she does not like religion does not mean what she has to contribute to the discussion is less valuable. And it is no more disrespectful than believers freely telling non believers that they will essentially burn in hell for not believing. There's a difference in presentation. buny dismisses and tries to invalidate people's points of view if they mention that they are religious. She also takes underhand jabs in her comments that she probably thinks people don't see but we do. You, on the other hand, one can have a discussion with you coming out of your mouth and tucking snide remarks in between points you are making. You, Tokyo, know how to except that people have different points of views and beliefs. bunyuhhh, however, posts her points in and seemingly has a problem with understanding that everyone doesn't and won't think like her. As for the bolded, I don't agree with anyone doing that but I also don't understand how it would be disrespectful to a non believer if they don't believe in it anyway./

accept*  and you are wrong, very wrong.  I am the 1st to be all for equality & fairness. I also have said several times over that we are all different & we don't all think alike.  You are pulling lies out of thin air.   You are very judgemental & elitist.  You are quick to namecall & belittle posters in the sex section & TTT.  .  I don't invalidate anyone's pov.  I state my opinion just like everyone else.  You have selective reading & a biased opinion.  You are not empathetic nor open minded

Oh, so she didn't lie at all. She just stated her opinion, which you don't agree with, so you decided to call her a liar. I see....