| Author |
|
Random Thoughts
Elite Member
Joined: Aug 10 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 68150
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 16 2013 at 12:17am |
Alias_Avi wrote:
Most people will assume that the story is fictional but most people will
also believe that the cushion of the story (how the Titanic sunk and
other micro and macro details) are factual
How much you wanna bet
that the average person thinks, for instance, that the people on board
were aware of the ship hitting an iceberg and panicked getting into the
life boats?
Probably many
Random Thoughts wrote:
Word. Like some people walk out of seeing the movie Titanic with an attitude because the main plot was fiction.
|
|
I think even more people will see Django and believe
cowboys blowing up people and having shootouts at a plantation to save a
woman is all fictional. Maybe a lot of people leave Django
asking "did mandigo fighting happen?" but just as many ask "did that
officer really commit suicide after killing an innocent person (answer
is no. In real life, he was actually helping as many people as he could).
|
 |
|
Sponsored Links
|
|
 |
Alias_Avi
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 10 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 162669
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 16 2013 at 12:19am |
|
ok RT
|
 |
Gkisses
Elite Member
Joined: Jul 12 2008
Location: CrackaIsland
Status: Offline
Points: 235716
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 16 2013 at 12:20am |
Alias_Avi wrote:
Not a literal sidekick Random
Sidekick in the sense he is not the main character, he plays the side charcter to Dr. Schultz He is not the main character until the death of Calvin Candie and that doesn't happen until the 3rd quarter of this movie
Btw... what kind of "main character" doesn't kill the main vilian? lmao He kills the friggen' house slave. How lame (and of course QT relays the message to the black viewer that our biggest enemy during slavery was ourselves. how special) |
Thats not exactly true tho@ the first part.... not sure what u mean by the last part
|
 |
Random Thoughts
Elite Member
Joined: Aug 10 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 68150
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 16 2013 at 12:21am |
Alias_Avi wrote:
Not a literal sidekick Random
Sidekick in the sense he is not the main character, he plays the side charcter to Dr. Schultz He is not the main character until the death of Calvin Candie and that doesn't happen until the 3rd quarter of this movie
Btw... what kind of "main character" doesn't kill the main vilian? lmao He kills the friggen' house slave. How lame (and of course QT relays the message to the black viewer that our biggest enemy during slavery was ourselves. how special)
Random Thoughts wrote:
Gkisses said "he may have been presented as such," which corroborates what QT is saying about writing a narrative anxiety. By the time Foxx showed up to Candyland as a free man, he was no longer a sidekick. And that wasn't 75% into the movie.
|
|
If Foxx is to get nominated for any awards, he'd be getting nominated as the lead...or main character. Waltz is being nominated as a supporting character. Nvmind. That's not really relevant to what you're saying. And I totally disagree about him only becoming the 'main character' when Leo dies. Nope. He became the focus of the movie as soon as he got to Candyland. Leo paid ALL of his attention to Foxx. That's when Foxx started bossing around the slaves and having a bunch of dialog. That was still in the 2nd act of the movie.
Edited by Random Thoughts - Jan 16 2013 at 12:23am
|
 |
Alias_Avi
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 10 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 162669
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 16 2013 at 12:24am |
|
I don't really care about the specifics of this movie tbh, i gave my review and opinion already. Nothing left to say
Anyways, I just think that people should think twice about insulting Spike Lee in favor of QT
|
 |
afrokock
Elite Member
Joined: May 19 2008
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 350956
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 16 2013 at 12:25am |
|
I thought HLG negated his relevancy in speaking on black issues on Bhm because of his white wife?
Or are we back to quoting that brother again?
Edited by afrokock - Jan 16 2013 at 12:27am
|
 |
joileprincess
Platinum Member
Joined: Feb 22 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 27643
|
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 16 2013 at 12:27am |
|
I am enjoying this discussion.
Sidenote, I really like how Dick touched on the use of the word n*gger. Its true that they began the use of it in the current context and are now telling us its inappropriate to say. And having Black people buy into the notion that our use of it is what encourages their continued justification for using it. Like WTF? How did they manage to twist that sh*t around.
|
 |
Alias_Avi
Elite Member
Joined: Oct 10 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 162669
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 16 2013 at 12:27am |
|
afro,
his opinion is not relevant to this discussion he gave the interview with QT when QT admitted that Django is a sidekick throughout part of this movie
I kinda had to quote him too
|
 |
afrokock
Elite Member
Joined: May 19 2008
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 350956
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 16 2013 at 12:29am |
joileprincess wrote:
I am enjoying this discussion.
Sidenote, I really like how Dick touched on the use of the word n*gger. Its true that they began the use of it in the current context and are now telling us its inappropriate to say. And having Black people buy into the notion that our use of it is what encourages their continued justification for using it. Like WTF? How did they manage to twist that sh*t around.
|
yes that was among many gems for me..
|
 |
Random Thoughts
Elite Member
Joined: Aug 10 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 68150
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: Jan 16 2013 at 12:29am |
joileprincess wrote:
I am enjoying this discussion.
Sidenote, I really like how Dick touched on the use of the word n*gger. Its true that they began the use of it in the current context and are now telling us its inappropriate to say. And having Black people buy into the notion that our use of it is what encourages their continued justification for using it. Like WTF? How did they manage to twist that sh*t around.
|
Good point.
|
 |